U.S. Regulation

Why Anti-CBDC Act Protects Financial Freedom

Editorial Team
3 min read
Published: November 19, 2025
Updated: November 19, 2025

Anti-CBDC proposals emphasize privacy, choice, and limiting state control over transactions.

U.S. crypto regulationAnti-CBDC ActprivacySection:Stablecoins

Why the Anti‑CBDC Act Protects Financial Freedom

Thesis: Central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) can concentrate transactional visibility and control in state hands. The Anti‑CBDC Act argues for privacy, choice, and market competition — limiting CBDC scope while promoting compliant stablecoin frameworks. This longform reviews principles, architectures, trade‑offs, safeguards, and the internal link network that supports U.S. crypto policy.

1) Principles: privacy, choice, competition

The Act’s core values:

  • Privacy: protect transaction metadata from blanket state visibility
  • Choice: allow citizens and merchants to pick payment rails (cards, ACH, stablecoins)
  • Competition: prevent state monopolies that crowd out private innovation

2) CBDC architectures and risks

CBDCs vary: account‑based vs token‑based, retail vs wholesale. Risks include:

  • Centralized data visibility; potential surveillance expansion
  • Programmability used for account restrictions or targeted controls
  • Vendor lock‑in; reduced platform competition and resilience

3) Stablecoins as a market alternative

Compliant stablecoins (e.g., USDC) can deliver:

  • Reserve transparency and audits; bank/clearinghouse integrations; 24/7 settlement
  • Merchant protections (refunds/chargebacks); programmable business logic
  • Cross‑border corridors with FX transparency and tax connectors

Related reads:

4) Policy trade‑offs and safeguards

Trade‑offs:

  • State ability to intervene during crises vs citizen privacy
  • Unified rails vs innovation diversity

Safeguards:

  • Strict access controls and court‑ordered visibility; privacy‑preserving audits
  • Market‑neutral interop standards to avoid vendor lock‑in
  • Transparent policy triggers for emergency actions

5) Technical controls for privacy and integrity

  • Zero‑knowledge proofs for reserve attestations without leaking customer data
  • Threshold signatures and multi‑party computation; minimized data retention
  • On‑chain anomaly detection with explainable alerts; post‑incident disclosures

6) Merchant and citizen experience

  • Fee caps and predictable refunds/chargebacks
  • Simple onboarding and ERP/tax integrations
  • Clear risk labels and education modules for complex flows

7) Scenarios: Anti‑CBDC with pro‑stablecoin policy

Optimistic: CBDC scope limited to wholesale; stablecoins power retail and cross‑border payments; privacy‑preserving compliance scales.

Base: CBDC pilots remain narrow; private rails expand; guardrails for data access mature.

Conservative: CBDC ambition grows; industry pushes for strict safeguards and privacy tech adoption.

8) Action plan for builders and policymakers

  • Adopt privacy‑preserving KYC/blacklists; limit data exposure
  • Publish reserve dashboards; automate disclosures and incident reports
  • Offer merchant SDKs with refunds/chargebacks, tax connectors, and invoicing

9) Internal link network

10) Conclusion

The Anti‑CBDC Act aims to protect civil liberties, preserve market choice, and accelerate private‑sector payment innovation. Combined with stablecoin frameworks, it forms a balanced policy: the state keeps wholesale levers; citizens and merchants retain privacy and competitive retail rails. The work is to engineer privacy and integrity as defaults — not afterthoughts.

Tools & resources